<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dlp-En — TechCom</title>
    <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/tag/dlp-en/</link>
    <description>Latest TechCom news and insights on enterprise IT solutions.</description>
    <generator>UB CMS</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:44:35 +0300</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://techcom.org.ua/en/tag/dlp-en/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI security: preventing data leaks and prompt injection in services</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-security-platform-protecting-ai-services-from-prompt-injection-and-data-leaks/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:44:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-security-platform-protecting-ai-services-from-prompt-injection-and-data-leaks/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned from an experimental technology to an integral part of business processes, particularly in the banking sector. From chatbots for support to fraud detection and risk analysis systems, AI services process vast amounts of confidential data and participate in decision-making. Consequently, their security has become a paramount concern. The rapid integration of AI into critical infrastructure and the rise of associated cyber threats make strengthening defenses an urgent task for 2026-2027.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DLP methodologies for protecting corporate content in remote work</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/dlp-strategies-for-corporate-content-protection-in-distributed-work/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 06:12:08 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/dlp-strategies-for-corporate-content-protection-in-distributed-work/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Distributed work and challenges for DLP&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Projections indicate that by 2026, over 70% of global companies will adopt hybrid work models, posing substantial challenges to traditional data protection strategies. Distributed infrastructure, the use of personal devices (BYOD), and the proliferation of cloud services increase the risks of confidential information leakage. Classic perimeter security measures are becoming insufficient, necessitating a shift towards more flexible and intelligent DLP solutions based on context and behavioral analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automating compliance audits with artificial intelligence</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-drives-compliance-audit-automation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 22:52:30 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-drives-compliance-audit-automation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Gartner, by 2026, over 40% of large organizations will leverage AI solutions for automating audit and compliance processes, significantly accelerating the attainment and confirmation of ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 certifications. Traditional audit approaches, relying on manual data collection and document review, are becoming excessively resource-intensive and slow amidst the ever-increasing complexity of IT infrastructure and regulatory requirements.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Challenges of traditional information security audits&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The process of preparing for and undergoing audits for compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 standards is a complex task demanding significant time and resources. The primary challenges include:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Zero Trust in legacy environments: migration versus adaptation</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-legacy-systems-migration-or-adaptation/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 06:05:19 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-legacy-systems-migration-or-adaptation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Cybersecurity challenges for legacy systems&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Gartner research, by 2026, over 50% of organizations investing in Zero Trust solutions will not achieve expected results due to focusing solely on new systems and neglecting legacy infrastructure. Legacy systems, often the backbone of critical business operations, pose a significant risk due to the absence of modern authentication, authorization, and network segmentation mechanisms. Amidst the growing number of cyberattacks and strengthening regulatory requirements like NIS2, protecting these systems becomes a priority.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Addressing cybersecurity challenges in hybrid infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/cybersecurity-for-hybrid-infrastructure-challenges-and-solutions/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 06:07:08 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/cybersecurity-for-hybrid-infrastructure-challenges-and-solutions/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 85% of large enterprises will adopt hybrid cloud strategies, increasing demands for comprehensive information security systems (ISS). Growing data volumes, distributed infrastructure, and the constant evolution of cyber threats require companies to rethink their security approaches. Ensuring compliance with regulations like ISO/IEC 27001 and NIS2 is becoming critically important for maintaining operational resilience and customer trust.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Architectural complexities and fragmentation&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Hybrid infrastructure, combining on-premises servers, private, and public clouds, creates unique challenges for ISS. Each component has its own security mechanisms, leading to fragmented control and potential gaps. This complicates centralized security policy management, monitoring, and incident response. For example, different cloud providers may have incompatible APIs for identity and access management, necessitating the development of complex integration solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protocols for data security during employee offboarding by 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/securing-data-during-employee-offboarding-by-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 06:12:10 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/securing-data-during-employee-offboarding-by-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to analytical reports, by 2026, up to 70% of corporate data breaches will be linked to insufficiently effective employee offboarding processes. This highlights the critical need to review and strengthen access management policies after termination. Despite significant investments in perimeter security and threat detection systems, internal risks, particularly those arising from the improper disconnection of former employees from corporate systems, remain one of the most serious vulnerabilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adopting Zero Trust architecture for modern ERP security</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-architecture-a-new-cybersecurity-paradigm-for-erp-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 06:08:34 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-architecture-a-new-cybersecurity-paradigm-for-erp-systems/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Microsoft, implementing Zero Trust principles can reduce the risk of successful cyberattacks by 50% or more. For mission-critical systems like ERP, which store financial, operational, and sensitive data, the traditional &#34;trust but verify&#34; approach has proven insufficient. Perimeter security, which assumes trust within internal networks, is no longer effective in the face of hybrid cloud infrastructures, remote work, and ever-increasing threat complexity.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;What is Zero Trust and why is it important for ERP?&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Zero Trust is a cybersecurity model based on the principle of &#34;never trust, always verify.&#34; It requires that every user, device, application, or workload, regardless of its location, be authenticated, authorized, and continuously verified before being granted access to network resources. For ERP systems, which are the central nervous system of any enterprise, this means:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mitigating 2026 insider threats via AI-enhanced offboarding</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-powered-offboarding-defending-against-insider-threats-in-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 06:05:48 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-powered-offboarding-defending-against-insider-threats-in-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Approximately 60% of corporate data breaches in 2025 were recorded after an employee&#39;s termination – while their access formally remained active. Insider threats originating from current or former employees, contractors, or partners remain one of the most complex cybersecurity challenges. With the evolution of hybrid work models and the widespread use of cloud services, traditional offboarding approaches are becoming insufficient for effectively protecting sensitive data. In 2026, companies will increasingly turn to AI-based solutions to automate and enhance employee offboarding processes, minimizing risks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Trust for legacy systems: replacement or adaptation by 2026?</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-legacy-systems-adaptation-or-full-replacement-by-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:27:45 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-legacy-systems-adaptation-or-full-replacement-by-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Microsoft, 80% of cyberattacks in 2023 were linked to compromised credentials, highlighting the ineffectiveness of traditional perimeter security models. The Zero Trust concept, which mandates continuous verification of access to resources regardless of their location, is no longer just a recommendation but a necessity. However, its implementation in environments dominated by legacy systems, developed decades ago without consideration for modern threats, presents a significant challenge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Zero Trust for Hybrid Infrastructure Security</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-and-its-role-in-hybrid-infrastructure-protection/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:39:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-and-its-role-in-hybrid-infrastructure-protection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Imagine this scenario: a remote employee connects to the corporate network via VPN. The traditional security model often grants them broad access to internal resources after a single authentication. But what if their device is compromised, or their credentials are stolen? This is precisely where the fundamental weakness of outdated approaches lies, opening the door for attackers to move laterally within the network. In hybrid infrastructures, where data and applications are distributed across on-premises servers, private, and public clouds, this risk is amplified.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
