<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Iso-Iec-27001-En — TechCom</title>
    <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/tag/iso-iec-27001-en/</link>
    <description>Latest TechCom news and insights on enterprise IT solutions.</description>
    <generator>UB CMS</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:44:35 +0300</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://techcom.org.ua/en/tag/iso-iec-27001-en/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI security: preventing data leaks and prompt injection in services</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-security-platform-protecting-ai-services-from-prompt-injection-and-data-leaks/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:44:35 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-security-platform-protecting-ai-services-from-prompt-injection-and-data-leaks/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, artificial intelligence (AI) has transitioned from an experimental technology to an integral part of business processes, particularly in the banking sector. From chatbots for support to fraud detection and risk analysis systems, AI services process vast amounts of confidential data and participate in decision-making. Consequently, their security has become a paramount concern. The rapid integration of AI into critical infrastructure and the rise of associated cyber threats make strengthening defenses an urgent task for 2026-2027.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Investigating unknown sitemaps in GSC: legacy CMS or security breach</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/unknown-sitemap-gsc-compromise/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:39:44 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/unknown-sitemap-gsc-compromise/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The appearance of an unknown sitemap in Google Search Console (GSC) is an alarming signal that corporate web resource administrators and IT department heads often underestimate. Instead of recognizing it as a marker of site compromise, the incident is frequently dismissed as a technical glitch or the result of legacy plugins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As cybersecurity experts note, such an artifact is most often the result of content injection and page injection. In this situation, chaotic deletion of the suspicious file does not solve the problem but merely destroys the digital evidence needed for forensic analysis, leaving backdoors for persistence.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Trust implementation for hybrid environments where traditional perimeters fail</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-hybrid-infrastructure-where-the-network-perimeter-no-longer-works/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:23:52 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-for-hybrid-infrastructure-where-the-network-perimeter-no-longer-works/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The shift to hybrid infrastructures, combining on-premises resources with cloud services, has blurred the traditional boundaries of corporate networks. Oleh Kravchenko, a cybersecurity engineer, notes that under these conditions, the network perimeter—which has been the foundation of security for decades—is no longer a sufficient line of defense. The rise of remote work, the adoption of SaaS solutions, and BYOD policies demand a fundamentally new approach to security, where trust in any user or device is absent by default. This concept, known as Zero Trust, is becoming not just a recommendation but a mandatory requirement for protecting corporate data and systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Transitioning the public sector from baseline compliance to active cybersecurity</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/from-compliance-to-proactive-cybersecurity-for-the-public-sector/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 06:08:12 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/from-compliance-to-proactive-cybersecurity-for-the-public-sector/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The Ukrainian government&#39;s Computer Emergency Response Team, CERT-UA, issued a warning on May 21st of this year regarding an updated toolkit used by the cyber group UAC-0057. This group is actively employing new malware, OYSTERFRESH, OYSTERSHUCK, and OYSTERBLUES, in phishing campaigns targeting Ukrainian public organizations, as detailed in a CERT-UA report. This event once again underscores the continuous evolution of cyber threats and the necessity for the public sector to reassess its cybersecurity strategies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automating compliance audits with artificial intelligence</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-drives-compliance-audit-automation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 22:52:30 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/ai-drives-compliance-audit-automation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Gartner, by 2026, over 40% of large organizations will leverage AI solutions for automating audit and compliance processes, significantly accelerating the attainment and confirmation of ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 certifications. Traditional audit approaches, relying on manual data collection and document review, are becoming excessively resource-intensive and slow amidst the ever-increasing complexity of IT infrastructure and regulatory requirements.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Challenges of traditional information security audits&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The process of preparing for and undergoing audits for compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 standards is a complex task demanding significant time and resources. The primary challenges include:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Addressing cybersecurity challenges in hybrid infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/cybersecurity-for-hybrid-infrastructure-challenges-and-solutions/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 06:07:08 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/cybersecurity-for-hybrid-infrastructure-challenges-and-solutions/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 85% of large enterprises will adopt hybrid cloud strategies, increasing demands for comprehensive information security systems (ISS). Growing data volumes, distributed infrastructure, and the constant evolution of cyber threats require companies to rethink their security approaches. Ensuring compliance with regulations like ISO/IEC 27001 and NIS2 is becoming critically important for maintaining operational resilience and customer trust.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Architectural complexities and fragmentation&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Hybrid infrastructure, combining on-premises servers, private, and public clouds, creates unique challenges for ISS. Each component has its own security mechanisms, leading to fragmented control and potential gaps. This complicates centralized security policy management, monitoring, and incident response. For example, different cloud providers may have incompatible APIs for identity and access management, necessitating the development of complex integration solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Streamlining the transition of legacy systems to hybrid infrastructure by 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/optimizing-legacy-system-migration-to-hybrid-infrastructure-by-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 06:06:58 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/optimizing-legacy-system-migration-to-hybrid-infrastructure-by-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 80% of enterprises will utilize hybrid or multi-cloud strategies for managing their IT infrastructures, according to Gartner forecasts. This signifies that legacy system migration is evolving into a complex task, demanding not just data transfer but a profound transformation of architecture, processes, and security approaches. Optimizing this process in 2026 involves integrating on-premises resources with cloud services, ensuring business continuity, and maximizing the benefits of both environments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Future trends in AI-powered ECM for corporate content by 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ai-driven-ecm-the-future-of-corporate-content-management-by-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 06:09:03 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ai-driven-ecm-the-future-of-corporate-content-management-by-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 70% of new enterprise content management (ECM) systems will integrate artificial intelligence capabilities to automate processes and enhance efficiency. This will transform ECM from a passive repository into a proactive decision-making tool, capable of independently processing, classifying, and analyzing vast amounts of data. The increasing complexity of regulatory requirements, growing volumes of unstructured data, and the need for business process optimization demand new approaches to information management.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Securing enterprise data within multicloud architectures</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/data-security-in-a-multicloud-world/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 06:08:05 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/data-security-in-a-multicloud-world/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Challenges of hybrid and multicloud infrastructure&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 80% of large enterprises will adopt hybrid and multicloud strategies, significantly complicating the cybersecurity landscape. The distribution of data and applications across on-premises, private, and public clouds (Azure, AWS, Google Cloud) introduces new challenges in maintaining a unified level of protection. Key issues include fragmented security policies, monitoring complexity, identity and access management, and ensuring compliance with regulations such as ISO/IEC 27001 and Ukrainian CIS standards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Adopting Zero Trust architecture for modern ERP security</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-architecture-a-new-cybersecurity-paradigm-for-erp-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 06:08:34 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-architecture-a-new-cybersecurity-paradigm-for-erp-systems/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;According to Microsoft, implementing Zero Trust principles can reduce the risk of successful cyberattacks by 50% or more. For mission-critical systems like ERP, which store financial, operational, and sensitive data, the traditional &#34;trust but verify&#34; approach has proven insufficient. Perimeter security, which assumes trust within internal networks, is no longer effective in the face of hybrid cloud infrastructures, remote work, and ever-increasing threat complexity.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;What is Zero Trust and why is it important for ERP?&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Zero Trust is a cybersecurity model based on the principle of &#34;never trust, always verify.&#34; It requires that every user, device, application, or workload, regardless of its location, be authenticated, authorized, and continuously verified before being granted access to network resources. For ERP systems, which are the central nervous system of any enterprise, this means:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ensuring NIS2 and ISO/IEC 27001 compliance in cybersecurity</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-and-compliance-with-nis2-and-isoiec-27001/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:07:31 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-and-compliance-with-nis2-and-isoiec-27001/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In October 2024, the NIS2 directive became effective in the EU, expanding the scope of cybersecurity requirements to a significantly larger number of sectors than its predecessor. This means companies working with European clients or as part of their supply chains must bring their systems and processes into compliance with the new standards. Simultaneously, the international standard ISO/IEC 27001 remains a fundamental tool for building and maintaining an effective information security management system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate document management and ECM solutions</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ecm-and-corporate-document-management/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 06:07:41 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ecm-and-corporate-document-management/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;Challenges in corporate document management&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Corporate document management is one of the most complex tasks for organizations of any size. The growing volume of data, the need to comply with regulatory requirements, and the demand for quick access to information create significant challenges. Manual document processing leads to wasted time, errors, reduced productivity, and increased security risks. Typical problems include disparate information repositories, lack of unified standards, difficulties with version control and access, and slow document approval and signing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trends in AI and VoIP business communications for 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/voip-and-ai-communications-for-business/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:05:51 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/voip-and-ai-communications-for-business/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Traditional analog PBX systems increasingly fail to meet modern business requirements for scalability, flexibility, and integration with corporate applications. Their maintenance is costly, while their functionality is often limited. VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) fundamentally transforms business communications by converting voice calls into digital data transmitted over IP networks. This approach delivers a range of benefits that have become essential for modern organizations.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cost reduction:&lt;/strong&gt; lower international and long-distance calling expenses through the use of existing internet infrastructure.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Scalability:&lt;/strong&gt; rapid addition or removal of users and expansion of functionality without significant capital investments.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Flexibility and mobility:&lt;/strong&gt; access to corporate telephony from anywhere via IP phones, softphones, or mobile applications.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Integration:&lt;/strong&gt; seamless connectivity with CRM, ERP, document management systems, and other business applications through APIs.&lt;/li&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;AI in Communications: A New Level of Interaction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming business communications far beyond traditional automation. Modern AI solutions can analyze large volumes of data, understand natural language, predict customer behavior, and personalize interactions. This not only improves operational efficiency but also enhances customer experience.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Methodologies for FinOps and cloud expenditure management</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-and-cloud-cost-management-strategies/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:05:26 +0300</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-and-cloud-cost-management-strategies/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The head of the development department at a major financial institution faced a challenge: despite all efforts to optimize the architecture, the monthly cloud services bill continued to grow, regularly exceeding the planned budget by 15-20%. Analysis revealed that the causes were not only unaccounted-for peak loads but also inefficient resource utilization, redundant capacity, and a lack of transparency in cost allocation across various projects. This scenario, unfortunately, is typical for many companies migrating to the cloud without a clear cost management strategy.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regulatory demands and the critical first 24 hours of incident response</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/incident-response-first-24-hours/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 12:36:33 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/incident-response-first-24-hours/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The first 24 hours after detecting a compromise are the most stressful for any organization. When critical services fail and signs of unauthorized access appear, IT teams naturally want to &#34;put out the fire&#34; quickly: restart servers, restore from backups, and return to normal. However, this approach, focused solely on rapid technical recovery, is now outdated and dangerous for business survival.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Modern incident response is inextricably linked to regulatory requirements. Attempting to immediately erase traces of an intruder destroys digital evidence (forensics), complicates investigations, and prevents timely notification of regulators. This article explores how to synchronize threat containment measures with strict compliance requirements during the first, most critical day after a breach.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why SIEM and certifications fail to guarantee operational resilience</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/compliance-trap-siem-certification/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:42:48 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/compliance-trap-siem-certification/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Organizations are increasingly falling into the &#34;compliance and tools trap,&#34; where investments in SIEM platforms and successful certification audits do not translate into real resilience against modern threats. The problem is that executives often view SIEM as a &#34;silver bullet&#34; for automatically solving security issues, and certification as a paper checklist for audits. In reality, a tool without a process creates only a false sense of security if not accompanied by deep operational changes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compliance alignment for NIS2, ISO/IEC 27001, and KSZI standards</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/integrating-nis2-iso27001-kszi/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:04:48 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/integrating-nis2-iso27001-kszi/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;By 2026, cybersecurity compliance has ceased to be a mere formality. According to the ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 report, which analyzed 4,875 incidents between July 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025, 53.7% of affected organizations fall into the category of essential entities. This makes aligning corporate systems with the NIS2 directive and modern international standards a critical business task.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, in practice, Ukrainian companies working with European partners face synchronization challenges. They must simultaneously meet strict EU directives (NIS2), undergo process certification for ISO/IEC 27001, and maintain a comprehensive information protection system (KSZI) for domestic regulators. Attempting to implement these requirements in isolation leads to chaos, redundant audits, and &#34;paper-based security&#34; that fails to stop real cyberattacks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cybersecurity discipline: business risks, threat modeling, and design</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-threat-modeling-architecture/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:42:17 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-threat-modeling-architecture/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The updated NIST CSF 2.0 framework has officially established the &#39;Govern&#39; function as the core of modern cybersecurity. This decision has shifted information security from a purely technical IT department task to a strategic corporate governance imperative. Building security based on a &#39;firefighting&#39; approach or chaotic procurement of security software licenses is a path to inevitable financial and reputational losses. Effective enterprise cyber resilience requires the integration of threat modeling, architectural controls, and business risks into a single, managed discipline.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2026 Electronic Document Management: AI-driven archiving and support</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ai-assistants-and-archiving-automation-in/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 11:21:34 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/electronic-document-management/ai-assistants-and-archiving-automation-in/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h1&gt;Electronic Document Management 2026: AI Assistants and Archiving Automation&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;At the end of reporting periods, legal and administrative departments process large volumes of documents: contracts, addenda, invoices, and acts. Each document must be classified, validated, enriched with metadata, and archived. These operations are still often manual or semi-automated, making them time-consuming and prone to errors, delays, and data inconsistencies.&lt;/p&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Modern document management approaches rely on AI/ML technologies to automate these processes. These are no longer experimental tools but applied solutions already used in enterprise ECM and DMS systems (Enterprise Content Management / Document Management Systems).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Banking efficiency and cost optimization strategies in multi-cloud environments</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-in-multi-cloud-how-banks-optimize-costs-and-boost-efficiency/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 17:46:17 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-in-multi-cloud-how-banks-optimize-costs-and-boost-efficiency/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;IT cloud spending is constantly increasing, posing one of the most pressing challenges for financial institutions today. After migrating to cloud environments, particularly in multi-cloud models, many banks face unpredictable spikes in their monthly bills. This occurs due to several factors: from &lt;em&gt;orphaned&lt;/em&gt; resources (forgotten virtual machines or databases that continue to incur costs) to &lt;em&gt;overprovisioning&lt;/em&gt; of Kubernetes clusters, which are reserved with excess capacity and not fully utilized. Dormant testing and development environments, a lack of strategy for using &lt;em&gt;reserved instances&lt;/em&gt; (discounted capacity) and spot instances (temporary, cheaper capacity) only exacerbate the problem. Consequently, cloud bills grow, but transparency regarding exactly where the money is going is lacking, complicating budget planning and control.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Managing and reducing infrastructure expenditures through FinOps</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-optimizing-cloud-infrastructure-costs/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:27:20 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/infrastructure/finops-optimizing-cloud-infrastructure-costs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Today, as most enterprise clients have migrated to hybrid or multi-cloud models, managing cloud infrastructure costs has become a significant challenge. Industry trends indicate that a substantial portion of cloud budgets is spent inefficiently due to a lack of transparency and proper control. This is precisely where FinOps comes in – an operational model that unites finance and IT teams to achieve maximum value from cloud investments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Significant developments for SCADA and Industrial IoT in 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/bpm-en/industrial-iot-and-scada-key-trends-for-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 09:08:34 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/bpm-en/industrial-iot-and-scada-key-trends-for-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, the integration of Industrial IoT (IIoT) and SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems is a key factor in enhancing operational efficiency and competitiveness for industrial enterprises. According to industry analysts, a significant portion of manufacturing companies have already implemented or are actively testing IIoT solutions for process optimization, predictive maintenance, and improved safety. This is not merely a technological evolution but a fundamental shift in production management approaches, requiring deep data integration and automation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2026 outlook for SCADA systems and Industrial IoT</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/bpm-en/industrial-iot-and-scada-trends-for-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:03:46 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/bpm-en/industrial-iot-and-scada-trends-for-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In 2026, Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems continue to evolve, transforming operational efficiency and security in critical infrastructure, manufacturing, and energy sectors. According to industry observations, a significant portion of enterprise clients are actively implementing hybrid models that combine on-premises SCADA with cloud platforms for IoT device analytics and management.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;h2&gt;IT and OT convergence: new challenges and opportunities&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The traditional gap between IT (Information Technology) and OT (Operational Technology) is rapidly narrowing. Data from IoT sensors and SCADA systems are no longer just monitored but are integrated into corporate ERP and MES systems, feeding analytical platforms and decision support systems. This convergence demands new approaches to architecture, data governance, and, most importantly, cybersecurity. Standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 are becoming mandatory not only for IT but also for OT environments, especially in the context of NIS2, which extends to critical infrastructure operators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cybersecurity for AI: The emergence of DLP standards by 2026</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/dlp-for-ai-systems-the-new-cybersecurity-reality-of-2026/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:52:55 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/dlp-for-ai-systems-the-new-cybersecurity-reality-of-2026/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;Rising Risks of Data Leaks in AI Systems&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;By 2026, over 70% of new AI systems will experience data breaches due to inadequate Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution integration. Artificial intelligence, integrated into corporate processes, handles vast amounts of sensitive information—from customer personal data to trade secrets and intellectual property. This data is both the fuel for AI and its most vulnerable point. Traditional DLP systems, designed to protect structured data in conventional enterprise systems, often prove ineffective against complex attack vectors targeting AI models and their training datasets.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Zero Trust for Hybrid Infrastructure Security</title>
      <link>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-and-its-role-in-hybrid-infrastructure-protection/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:39:00 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcom.org.ua/en/cybersecurity/zero-trust-and-its-role-in-hybrid-infrastructure-protection/</guid>
      <description>&lt;!-- wp:freeform --&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Imagine this scenario: a remote employee connects to the corporate network via VPN. The traditional security model often grants them broad access to internal resources after a single authentication. But what if their device is compromised, or their credentials are stolen? This is precisely where the fundamental weakness of outdated approaches lies, opening the door for attackers to move laterally within the network. In hybrid infrastructures, where data and applications are distributed across on-premises servers, private, and public clouds, this risk is amplified.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
